Contributions of the system of Appraisal for the analysis of student reflections on emotions and orality

Authors

  • Renata Fabiana Cardinali Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto

Keywords:

learning diaries, higher education, English, orality, appraisal

Abstract

This paper is set in the field of spoken discourse and emotions in academic contexts. The objective is to analyze learning diaries written in Spanish by students in the first year of the Profesoradoand Licenciatura en inglésat the National University of Rio Cuarto resorting to the system of Appraisal (Martin y White, 2005), specifically the subsystem of Attitude, to find out about the entities students assess and the emotional, ethic, and aesthetic aspects they evaluate. The diaries are collected with thepurpose of helping students reflect on their learning rocesses and classroom experiences in relation to reading aloud tasks used in the Introduction to Phonetics course. The analysis of 29 narratives written in Spanish on the reading aloud in English task shows that the entities that are evaluated most frequently are the students themselves while the least frequently assessed are strategies, emotions, and teachers. The evaluations show positive polarity which are inscribed in the areas of affect and judgement where the evaluations that stand out are in/security and dis/inclination on the one hand, and capacity, tenacity and integrity, on the other. The insights provided by this analysis can contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon of academic emotions (Pekrun, Goetz, Titz, & Perry, 2002) in higher education which can be useful for students and teachers (Bonetto, Vaja & Paoloni, 2017). We think that good quality training implies focusing on an approach that fosters the development of the cognitive, ethic, affective, social and political dimensions of students upon entering university.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aristulle, Patricia del Carmen y Paoloni, Paola Verónica (2018). “El rol de las emociones en la construcción de identidades profesionales”, en Anuario digital de investigación educativa, 1, 280- 300. Recuperado de: http://revistas.bibdigital.uccor.edu.ar/index.php/adiv/article/view/3230 (12/09/22).

Barbeito, María Celina y Sánchez Centeno, Adelina (2016). “Las emociones en la formación inicial de profesores de inglés: resultados de una prueba piloto con narrativas visuales en la clase de fonética”, en Educación, Formación e Investigación, 2, 4. Recuperado de: http://dges-cba.edu.ar/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Revista_EFI_04-2016.pdf (12/09/22).

Barkhuizen, Gary, Benson, Phil, y Chik, Alice (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Londres y New York: Routledge.

Barlett, Tom (2019). “Models of Discourse in Systemic Functional Linguistics”, en Thompson, Bowcher, Fontaine, y Schönthal (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (1-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abhishek-Kashyap/publication/323377415_Language_Typology/links/5d404103299bf1995b56f067/Language-Typology.pdf (12/09/22).

Bonetto, Vanesa; Vaja, Arabela, y Paoloni, Paola (2017). “Creencias de Autoeficacia y Emociones Académicas en Estudiantes de Profesorados y de Ingeniería”, en Anuario de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Psicología, 3, 2, 116-131.

Borioli, Gloria (2019). “Interrogar la palabra. Oralidad y aprendizaje en la Universidad Nacional de Córdoba”, en Praxis educativa UNLPam, 23, 3, 1 - 12.

Bowcher, Wendy L., Fontaine, Lise, y Schönthal, David (2019). “Introduction”, en Thompson, Bowcher, Fontaine, y Schönthal (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 1-8. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/the-cambridge-handbook-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/554B4D53A0C1205CD9512D759F8E55BE (12/09/22).

Cardinali, Renata Fabiana y Barbeito, María Celina (2018). “Developing intonation skills in English: A systemic functional linguistics perspective”, en Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 8(1), 19 - 28.

Farrell, Thomas S. C. (2012). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re)Visiting Dewey and Schön. TESOL Journal, 3, 1, 7-16. Sage publications.

Gibson, Sally (2008). “Reading aloud: a useful learning tool?”, en ELT Journal, 62, 1, 29-36. Recuperado de: https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article-abstract/62/1/29/416435?redirectedFrom=fulltext (12/09/22).

Halliday, Michael y Matthiessen, Christian (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (Fourth edition). Londres y New York: Routledge.

Hood, Susan (2019). “Appraisal”, en Thompson, Bowcher, Fontaine, y Schönthal (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 382-409. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-handbook-of-systemic-functional-linguistics/appraisal/6177AE14C1809734D2CB6B433245FEFA (12/09/22).

Hood, Susan y Martin, James (2005). “Invocación de actitudes: El juego de la gradación de la Valoración en el discurso” en Revista Signos, 38, 58, 195–220. Recuperado de: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-09342005000200004&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en (12/09/22).

Macken-Horarik, Mary y Isaac, Anne (2014). “Appraising Appraisal”, en Thompson, Geoff y ALBA-JUEZ, Laura (Eds). Evaluation in Context (67-92). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Martín, James (2010). “Language, register and genre”, en Coffin, Lillis, y O’Halloran (Eds.) Applied Linguistics Methods, 12-32. Abingdon: Routledge and The Open University.

Martín, James (2017). “The Discourse Semantics of Attitudinal Relations: Continuing the Study of Lexis”. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 22–47. Recuperado de: https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/15403 (12/09/22).

Martín, James y Rose, David (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.

Martín, James y White, Peter (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ong, Walter (2005). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.

Oteíza, Teresa, y Pinuer, Claudio (2019). “El sistema de Valoración como herramienta teórico-metodológica para el estudio social e ideológico del discurso”, en Logos: Revista de Lingüística, Filosofía y Literatura, 29, 2. 207-229. Recuperado de: https://revistas.userena.cl/index.php/logos/article/view/1201/1281 (12/09/22).

Patton, Michael (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. California: Sage Publications Inc.

Pavlenko, Aneta (2007). “Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics”, en Applied Linguistics, 28, 2, 163–188.

Pekrun, Reinhard, Goetz, Thomas, Titz, Wolfram, y Perry, Raymond (2002). “Positive emotions in education”, en Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges, 149-173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Peña Borrero, Luis Bernardo (2018). “La competencia oral y escrita en la educación superior”. Recuperado de: https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1621/articles-189357_archivo_pdf_comunicacion.pdf (12/09/22).

Vaja, Arabela; Martinenco, Rebecca, y Martín, Rocío (2018). “Aportes para pensar las emociones académicas en clases universitarias”, en Contextos de Educación, 24, 79-89.

Published

25-11-2022

ARK