NUESTRO LUGAR EN EL MUNDO MORAL: HACIA UNA NEUTRALIDAD METAÉTICA RAZONABLE

Abstract

This paper addresses the philosophical debate between moral realism and anti-realism, examining the tensions between the idea of objective truth in ethics and skeptical objections that challenge its ontological and epistemic plausibility. Drawing on a  reconstruction of Guillermo Lariguet’s approach and critical contributions from authors such as Mackie, Harman, Greene, and Frankfurt, it analyzes some of the foundations, limits, and consequences of both positions. Following authors like Russell and Kane, it is suggested that the value of this inquiry lies not primarily in reaching certainties, but in fostering a reflective and open search for what we consider valuable.